No. 22-6181
Willie Speed v. Douglas Fender, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-conflict conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance ex-post-facto fourteenth-amendment sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-an-attorney's-conflict-of-interest-deprived-petitioner-of-his-rights-under-the-sixth-and-fourteenth-amendments-to-effective-assistance-and-due-process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. WHETHER AN ATTORNEY’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF HIS RIGHTS UNDER THE SIXTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE AND DUE PROCESS 2. WHETHER PETITIONER’S RIGHT AGAINST EX POST FACTO WAS VIOLATED WHERE SUBSEQUENT ENACTMENT OF LAW INCREASED HIS TERM OF IMPRISONMENT. . | | ' my 5
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-13
Waiver of right of respondent Douglas Fender to respond filed.
2022-11-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 30, 2022)
Attorneys
Douglas Fender
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent