Was the District Court's order denying petitioner's §2254 petition legal?

No question identified. : Questions FREsewTED x Was the District Covrt’s order fue petrtioner’s B2254 petition Liral in that it acteally odivelicated petitioner's (eapactial jvey Clain , vi Amenduent Violation? Dict the United States Covet of Appeals fe the Sixth Cireurt have jueisdection ia Confocearty of appellate jurisdiction to cleay relief in this Case, undec 2 use § 1291 ; Collings ve Miller, 252 v5. 364 (1920) ? ci. Was Petitioner entithkd to a Kener hearing 7? Hac the lower Court abused sits cliscretion by not Conclucti'n4 a hearing in thes Case? Can there be a merits cleersron On an impartial Sey Claim lalithoud a FBaratee hearing , weutel Pel troner be €nbitle! to 2 hearing? | a Tf ag the law is row, if a jury Cand Consicler evidence , not aclurHed at a trial to frac guilt Can a Feviewins Couct Consitlee that @viclence to alfiem 4 petitioners Conviction? labutel Fiding of fact basecl on thet @vidleace | be feasonable oc Uaslensonable B2zs5y CAVG>? An He lower Couct's Frdiags based on eviclence ia Violation of the Turner cule reasonable in petitioner's Case 7 }