No. 22-6196
Morris Rucker v. Jim Purviance, Executive Director, Tennessee Board of Parole, et al.
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim district-court due-process equal-protection ex-post-facto filing-fee standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the TN U.S. District Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals erred in denying petitioner's ex-post-facto-claim
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) WHETHER THE TN U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER'S EX POST FACTO CLAIM? (2) WHETHER THE TN U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER'S EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM? | (3) WHETHER THE TN U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER'S OTHER CLAIM?’ | (4) WHETHER THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER'S APPEAL DUE TO HIS | INABILITY TO PAY THE $505.00 APPELLATE FILING FEE?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2023)