No. 22-6206
Albert Holland, Jr. v. Florida
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance judgments judicial-review post-conviction-relief standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court is required to appeal a district court's denial of a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | L Whe the Tee fw “he 6. cor, “2S WLL Norree he ° 2. Whether A Cor 1S Yegtsred vo Appeal A Disprier courses Lev/Al oF A Phofrow for Kelre Fron Jukgen7s pdtelece Ww he awhetter 7 Fe? poe Live“ fp COur7s yu pegrity of “he LL igs. AppeLta re pree
Docket Entries
2023-05-22
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. See 28 U.S.C. §455(b)(3) and Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges, Canon 3C(1)(e) (prior government employment).
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-04-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-03-14
Reply of petitioner Albert Holland filed. (Distributed)
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-02-17
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2022-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 17, 2023.
2022-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 3, 2023 to February 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Albert Holland
Albert Holland Jr. — Petitioner
State of Florida
Carolyn M. Snurkowski — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent