Did the trial judge's refusal to recuse himself from presiding over the 3-day bench trial—while being an adverse party litigating against Shahrokhi— violate Shahrokhi's rights under the Due Process Clause?

question presented is— Did the trial judge’s refusal to recuse himself from presiding over the 3-day bench trial—while being an adverse party litigating against Shahrokhi— violate Shahrokhi’s rights under the Due Process Clause? i Question No. Two— Does Nevada Revised Statute 125C.0035(5) granting a single judge, to be the judge and the prosecutor at the same time and the right to try and convict accused on criminal statutes, in a civil setting, with no indictment, no adequate notice of alleged crimes, no jury-trial as mandated by law, no attorney standing by to assist, no presumption of innocent, on a lesser proof of standard “clear and convincing” instead of the traditional proof requirement of the “beyond reasonable doubt,” forcing litigants to be witness against themselves incriminating their 5th amendment rights interfere with the essentials of due process and fair treatment, as defined by United States Constitution? ii