No. 22-6226
James Armstrong v. Kathy Brittain, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Frackville, et al.
IFP
Tags: 28-U.S.C-2254(e)(1) circuit-court-review federal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-standard presumption-of-correctness state-court-determination statutory-interpretation third-circuit-court-of-appeals united-states-supreme-court
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the third Circuit Court of Appeals fail to apply it's face of opinion an petitioner habeas corpus j~etition on 'Presumption Of Correctness' mandated by 28-U.S.C-2254(e)(1)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Did the third Circuit Court of Appeals fail to apply it's face of opinion an petitioner habeas corpus j~etition on "Presumption Of Correctness" mandated by 28 U.S.C. §2254(e)(1) to the state court determination in accordance with the United States Supreme Court principles as well as many other Circuit Court's of Appeals? Br (i) Lab i J .
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2023)
Attorneys
James Armstrong
James Armstrong — Petitioner