No. 22-6227
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-amendments due-process equal-protection false-testimony indictment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargain state-action
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner denied due process and equal protection
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Questions Presented : 1. Was Petitioner denied due process and equal protection of the law in violation of Constitutional Amendments V and XIV when the State used known false and material testimony to obtain an Indictment? 2. Was Petitioner denied due process and equal protection of the law in violation of Constitutional Amendments V and XIV when the State knowingly used an Indictment obtained with false testimony to secure a conviction by plea? 3. Was Petitioner denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of Constitutional Amendments VI and XIV when his Attomeys withheld knowledge of false grand jury testimony? . if
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-01-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-12-23
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2022-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 5, 2023)
2022-09-30
Application (22A274) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until December 8, 2022.
2022-09-23
Application (22A274) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 9, 2022 to December 8, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
New York
Steven A. Bender — Westchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent
Steven A. Bender — Westchester District Attorneys Office, Respondent