Was the Habeas Corpus in this case Effectively Suspended in this case?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was the Habeas Corpus in this case Effectively Suspended in this case? when the officers of the courts kne\ , the petitioner's civil rights were restored? , | This petition for a writ of certiorari presents a novel question, of statutory interpretation concerning the {Any | conviction which has been ... had ... or has had] ... a question law requirement for the charging officer to | perform? | Was the United States required by Title 18, U.S.C. Section 922(g)bound by 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(20) to certify | documents containing information, containing successful completion of sentences (i.e., parole, paid fines, restitutions, probation, restoration of firearm rights, pardons, etc.) before filing indictment with a grand jury? Was the Due Process Clause(s) pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment and or the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution procedurally infringed when the officers of the court knew they did decline to exec 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(20)’s statute’s intent and interpretation of the plain meaning of Section 921(a) [(20])? Is this case, and cases alike, to assume, that no officer of the court are aware of the laws related to 18 U.S.C Sections, 921(a)(20), 922(g)(1), and 924(e)(1) and the state offeneses and [convictions to transpose to the required certified documents related to felons in possession of firearms? Would it contravene due process ar equal portections under Law? . bY . : te