Did the ruling(s), by disregarding testimony of material witness, proven to lie under oath violated petitioner's right to due process enshrined in fourteenth amendment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1. Did the ruling(s), by disregarding testimony of material witness, proven to lie under oath violated petitioner's right to due process enshrined in fourteenth | amendment. : 2. Did the ruling(s) disregard a material witness’s testimony proving fabricated evidence, violated petitioner’s right of due process, equal protection under ‘ the law, by fourteenth amendment rights. ; ; 3. Did the ruling(s), disregard violation of fifth amendment’s rights of the : petitioner, and. due process when a detective as a material witness; admitted ; under oath to obtain a coerced confession and destroyed an earlier voluntary : statement. . 4, Did BPOA, not err but acted with malicé and impunity, to flagrantly violate ; petitioner's fifth, fourteenth amendments and Due process of the law. ; . 6. Did the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ignore flagrant violations by BPOA by Affirmation of BPOA order. a. 7. Did, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania by its order, ignored violations of fifth, fourteenth and due process of law guaranteed under the , Constitution of the United States. a , (i) a) . : :