Robert Dale Hines v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
RAC i Z i sm
Hou> Co,M.rVy V^ViOo<4 fcsXt5 y. »\y ^0)-^ 1'^
K^vown sl/nce. +ke. ^^-vU gv-txle iAr^-ftc vi +k«s cog^s K>s ^cco^cA
re.pre.sovt me_ /A Coi^r-ty ke_ Ka£u3 + kcA X tj-^i-ved '/iacj X
Kt^e «te«sWv X Ptet^tA ^'iso-v V.<~e 4<?r *ke sec<W <-'«»^ ^:is &**«;
'lAl^^ ^l0/l *-S LO^v^^Ax.-fe.^,,■Vo
lc*W CkS V*v.y Ck'V^ O't' ^~\^~YJ <KV\
tke. <^p/}kocVi k i ^ i-ke. > i ©ki^■\^&p7\fe.y 'kcj \ oA,
C-kw^fty-VlOL I^^'rtvt*i+ iOckS ine.fN^ ♦» ConctaXrvj , + kfcit~s cc ©l.'4/e* e "ice. ta**'iJ«A>\
o-^vci oVe&+r t>y,A-j ®v.eio-vce..
Av t+uv, +U Sett's s^-U- d:^ tkc\
1*1.5 tkc Jrb*.\ t-ke /c~oye>s ui^tcA u)or(
t^e. kkcrje. -<c + kttxNV(l +kft tv^r f cKa^v^{t)
■Ga -fke, tkw^e- 7ke. ntx> A<<y^ fke_ AAcA cou.i~t-
f«-vV'£6 fk ov»sA +h,oA a»+n&c.il r<Ke4
yow '3 *w, tovk Ht uU^+ W cfpW^e* P^W^y ► <.« cU y<
tke s^^t: V(+e^ ckes-ii-*, £,} o r co^^-1 ,re.ce*s.>
✓ ✓/L>©7 y
cA«^c +k^C C/lkX Jk V ck» STk<t tVror 1 a c^pjG[;cc^' '£>/v 106^^^
Police. Seized <kr\+js
A tn^Ktu i y1 a. u •" 0cj>; -v k 0 Let ^ ^ *" ^
4e^[^r. s<^+ OA kke a^-ns/vU pVf-K
^ TW*./ £aunse.* ^^-5 iVtffecii^ b^ccu.s
Whether the Court violated the petitioner's constitutional rights, including due process and effective assistance of counsel