No. 22-6244

LeeAnn Morgan v. Regents of the University of California, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 7th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights fraud-concealment jury-trial medical-battery private-party seventh-amendment state-funded-medical-institution writ-of-error-coram-nobis
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the 7th Amendment provide for a jury trial in civil private matters between a private party and a state-funded medical institution?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does the 7th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provide that a Jury Trial be held in civil private matters between a private party and a State-funded medical Institution? . 2. Does a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis a long-held, common-law doctrine in California lie as a remedy for a plaintiffs recovery, for a trial Court to: a) Vacate a prior, erroneous judgment in a naively-filed medical “negligence” action, and b) To order a fairly-conducted jury trial, based upon newly discovered facts obtained long after the original action ended: facts which indicate that the matter falls under the various laws of: . 1) Concealed medical battery; 2) Fraud / fraudulent concealment; 3) Violations of the False Claims Act; 4) Violations of Unfair Competition Law; 5) Violations of Stark Anti-kickback Act; 6) Violations of several California Primary Rights during a surgery; 7) Violations of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act; 8) Violations of the Declaration of Helsinki; 9) Violations of FDA and ICH regulations; and 10) Violations of the Nuremburg Code (concealed human experimentation)? : 3. Does California Code of Civil Procedure Section 657 also lie as a statutory remedy in the trial court for a plaintiff's recovery under the same medical ; battery fact pattern as in #2 above? Page 2 of 17

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent The Regents of the Univ. of CA, et al. to respond filed.
2022-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2023)

Attorneys

LeeAnn Morgan
LeeAnn Morgan — Petitioner
LeeAnn Morgan — Petitioner
The Regents of the Univ. of CA, et al.
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent
Kenneth R PedrozaCole Pedroza LLP, Respondent