Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures

No question identified. : Whether the state of Georgia’s mandatory provider assignment-of benefit law drafted under Insurance Title 33: (Georgia -§ 33-24-54) is pre: ; empted by the Employee Retirement Investment ; Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Whether the Supreme Court case, Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, 1418. ; ; Ct. 474 (2020), overruled Physicians Multispecialty Group’ and voids ERISA preemption of O.C.G.A. § 33; 24-54 if the provider has a written assignment of benefit. *Physicians Multispecialty Grp. v. Health Care Plan of Horton Homes, Inc., 371 F.3d 1291, 1294 (11th Cir. . 2004) | iii