No. 22-6251

Onofre Tommy Serrano v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure appointment-of-counsel civil-rights conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review medical-treatment reasonable-time-to-consult right-to-counsel
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court has a prompt duty to appoint counsel once indigency attaches

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. Whether the eq Whto counsel has A “DRompt” com pow essk; once i pttaches Marsa ah ay the court to Appowst couse to pr edigentdebewdert widvou Ub 2 etary Jolin? } L. Does the desial of the cout} to A part coursgel for 3 days tet te Sdbsequest a ppowdine de of counscel psa pa ais ke coswsel, vim conflict of ithe nest? 3. Does the right to coursgel prondefoe vA Reasatable pynour af time +o contgult phot to Reptese-twhons at the “ekreel Stage” vitich itcludes legal adits +p the hosprial of video tele confepenernay, ts converser with a clewt rho is a medical miss-oF psd sot A ppeatiniay ot court? |

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Onofre Tommy Serrano
Onofre Tommy Serrano — Petitioner