No. 22-6253

Michael J. Moller, aka Michael Robinson v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-waiver certiorari criminal-procedure district-court due-process paycheck-protection-program plea-bargaining sentencing sophisticated-means-enhancement standard-of-review
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should certiorari be granted to address the enforceability of an appellate waiver where the District Court's entire inquiry consisted of a single question, even though that does not establish it was knowing, intelligent and voluntary?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Should certiorari be granted to address the enforceability of an appellate waiver where the District Court’s entire inquiry consisted of a single question, even though that does not establish it was knowing, intelligent and voluntary? 2. Should certiorari be granted to address whether filling out a Paycheck Protection Program loan application (PPP) warranted a sophisticated means enhancement-where even the Government agreed with Petitioner it did not? i

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Michael J. Moller, aka Michael Robinson
Steven A. FeldmanFeldman & Feldman, Petitioner
Steven A. FeldmanFeldman & Feldman, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent