No. 22-6254
Aaron Michael Murray v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial impartiality-standard judicial-ethics judicial-impartiality judicial-recusal media-bias media-coverage recusal
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a criminal defendant's due process right to a fair trial is violated when numerous media reports raise reasonable questions about a district court judge's impartiality
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Whether numerous local and national media reports, which brought facts | to light that have caused the public to question the district court's 7 impartiality in favor of the government, would objectively cause a criminal defendant to have a well-founded fear that he will not receive fair adjudication of his case at the hands of that judge in the future? . | i |
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)
Attorneys
Aaron M. Murrray
Aaron Michael Murray — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent