No. 22-6255
Deonte Courtez Gates v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: blakely-v-washington circuit-court-conflict constitutional-interpretation eighth-amendment federal-law juvenile-defendant relevant-conduct sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Punishment
Punishment
Latest Conference:
2023-01-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the relevant conduct sentencing guideline is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment as applied to conduct committed by a juvenile defendant
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW L. Whether the relevant conduct sentencing guideline is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment as applied to conduct committed by a juvenile defendant. I. Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided an important question of federal law in a way that conflicts with this Court’s holdings in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004) and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). ii
Docket Entries
2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)
Attorneys
Deonte Gates
Matthew George Borgula — SBBL Law, PLLC, Petitioner
Matthew George Borgula — SBBL Law, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent