No. 22-6258

Rondale Young v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: assimilated-crimes assimilative-crimes-act criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment houston-v-moore separate-sovereign-doctrine
Latest Conference: 2023-01-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether, pursuant to the Houston v. Moore, 18 U.S. 1 (1820) exception to the separate-sovereign doctrine, a defendant previously acquitted of murder under a state statute in state court can be tried for the same murder under the same state statute pursuant to a federal charge that assimilates "the laws of any State[.]"

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a defendant previously acquitted of murder under a state statute can be tried for the same murder under the same state statute pursuant to a federal charge that assimilates the laws of any State

Docket Entries

2023-01-09
Petition DENIED.
2022-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)

Attorneys

Rondale Young
Benjamin Lee ColemanBenjamin L. Coleman Law PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent