Question not identified

QUESTIONS PRESENTED: 1. Does the district court have subject matter jurisdiction over this case? 2. Do the actions and conduct of the district court in this specific individual case appear tantamount to Judicial Disability and conduct considered parallel to insurrection and rebellion as described in section three of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States : Constitution?: e Does the unauthorized practice of law as performed and explained by the affiliated state agencies, tribunal, and the employer's legal defense in this specific individual . case parallel conduct tantamount to: deprivation of constitutional and fundamental rights? Per the First, Fifth, Seventh, Tenth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution? In this individual case; Does the lower court tribunal have a legitimate, legal right, to deny an ignorant, indigent, unrepresented, disabled, African American woman’s right to an appeal per the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? 3. Do the actions and conduct of the district court in this specific individual case appear tantamount to Judicial Disability and conduct considered parallel to hate crimes, white : supremacy, and witness tampering as described in the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and section One of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? e Do the defendant's and lower court tripunal’s practice and explanation of pleading defenses as performed in this specific individual case parallel conduct tantamount to deprivation of constitutional and fundamental rights? Per the First, Fifth, Seventh, Tenth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution? 4. Do the actions and conduct of the employer, the state of Indiana, and the lower courts in this specific individual case appear tantamount to: Discriminatory practices and conduct considered parallel to Deprivation of fundamental rights, as described in the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, section One of the Thirteenth Amendment and section Three of the Fourteenth : Amendment of the United States Constitution? e Do any of the actions in this case: parallel conduct equal to: obstruction of justice, witness tampering, Insurrection and rebellion, and Involuntary Servitude per the United States Constitution? 5. Do the actions and conduct of the Employer in this specific individual case appear tantamount to Respondeat Superior, Promissory Estoppel, Improper Employment Practices, Misrepresentation, Misconduct, Abuse of Process and conduct considered parallel to insurrection and rebellion as described in section Four of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? 6. Does the absolute sovereignty of a state prevail over the absolute sovereignty of a person’s individual rights; or the absolute sovereignty of the Constitution of the United states; if the actions and conduct of the state in question appear corrupt and tantamount to conduct parallel to Improper Employment Practices, Misrepresentation, Misconduct, Abuse of SECTION #2 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1 . Process as described in the Tenth Amendment and Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? And are those actions and conduct considered parallel to insurrection, rebellion, FRAUD of government funds, and Breach of Contract as described in Section Three and Four of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution? SECTION #2 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 2