Whether the Supreme Court failed to address the decision of Magistrate Judge Payne and because the Supreme Court did not address this issue, the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated

No question identified. : —\— Should THe Sve tame Coat “Ona CarTronne Whore We EN DAG COULT, “DE ARS Fant THE S CT CHC Failed Id NEISe He Decision OF Meanie Pawel Klin & ecause, Te sluns Coun GTS Tis COUNTS Gdocadan f OK Fess IN WO vied G-Sia tht Bea aCe eh ES CHT Fr Sauces ~* CAO aE CRS <h re old Hs Cou QUANT Coranant \allbene Tet EN lore. COUT Ce ROE ON ME Sit Co eel 7S teva TE Melon (We ME, Shak Is Cuhiv& CAN Gatti Stes AOE RANI WS EXROSULE 70 Que Natal AQ THE Seon INMROMENSCLS Rs ach ey C\RO IM — CNICSS AEXCER bavi! Se oeceh an Rie > eS | (Cf Wed ViSiahione vrah ic IN im mere Couitsc, COMES of gS) V) VENI Coecce Gule1QN ? sCPeEl Case” — — _ Spel has Coc Barv Corona) shone We o) © Bali Oe] CULT AN boy Case MMe cial Ope sov WIRE V/A CON TAY TS (AVS Rossy | ae Can Tinrue ee ~ — WN AV eB SNe ARC cas Coy of, Clon €Xiabisted Law AS sie HH © ST COUTON Tues, Dal bennG AN dit E ENoncaS rEXGSSWE GUNSH Men Unldon ME Cunuleoe EGET OF CISC Nel Loli OS. Const Pra d SH, 1, (FWY 2, “CAQE) CASO” 7 Amon Eetel . ee Ax appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. Set KcMmon’ of Wailer CHR ikl CASE,“ RELATED CASES lento 2 Cannell Mauna RECT ate, Saen Y koa Ww Calender) ) — ehewlerg | 27-1826, HiSbens Co1Pus " orny “Se Mi Qu rnaye aes Asie Khia Courcat NRep (CSG P | SOadiuel Ga"20-12dog" 222VALS | HD2-cv-9135) F1KH243,1 4027 [#356516 CORT G29 -12-Yoro I