Whether the government and courts have acted within their constitutional authority in prosecuting and denying relief to an individual convicted of downloading 'illegal content' from internet newsgroups

No question identified. : : ne ee | phere been convicted of downloading “illegal content!“feamthe a newsgroups, a.k.a Usenet service of the fnfernet. The newsgroups is Wo den Toteractive ¢ omputer Secvice (16.9 of the Inte enet. Starting i tl S22 ete arpa petition nae 2t8fty ——n and the Governmee ot has filed ne objection tothe following, ordny responses Info actualy incest any atongdeinge ——— Rs taitonyleniandhe Supreme Court ulng spec Fite BES —gkarantee blanketimmunity teal providers and users of [CSS who. —lanct erate ar modify content. 3 the lay case as awrong fal presecution.and ceased.all related activity, —fitineaed prncedteal norsaclnapseatve aden the achisl Innocence _excephion. The. courts have ignored rejected or defied — jallof the above over repected motions; raising their owe —-ebyections with noo ppactunity forme tore Piy. Based onthig See nar te Lc Whotisthe conrect way forthe Government tecorrect peers itateon and anes asin ete ——§ | Are the Government and courts acting withia theie | | a Dinectly Related Cote Histery ee Original Ceiminal Couct Case: (US Distuict Cour forthe a -—_Nerthecn Distrctet New York, 52I2-C R-~63 United anni: a eeided 12/3/2013 it Direct Appeal: US Couck of Appeals forthe Second |S ireuif 14a 18 98> CR, United State 5. Jobe Killing beck __. | Published: 616 Fed App XING 2OIS US App. Lexis {1428 wane a decihedd LOPS {OUR a ble 2 BUSES SAH ecbans Corpus Petition: FAB=CY=120,—— a US Disteict Court fee the Northern District of Mews Neck, tet Tn Killing beck “United States decided | —__May_3, 2018 ee i ‘ a =] 0A Appeal U5 Gout nf ppaalsfaethe Second —— a insu f IB NbN, Jobe Killingbeck v United States, ap tse tf ft {Motion far Second er Consecutive Habeas Corpus Petition, US court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 20-3388, __ eh KiMlingbeck v. United States, decided 19/2 [2 OBO i ee a _. { e | em ee | Us Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, ZINIT 4, | Sohn Killlagheckw United States decided SMT/2024 TEE US Court of Appeals fen the Secand Circuit, 21-2687, Teh Killing beck v United States, decided 10/23/2024 __ — iin nent | Ceaet Tarisdictien. Defermination US Disteist Court feet blethen. tte tse ESRB ES, ne _Uaied Sfofes vTohe Willing beck. gn | Appeal forthe Second Circuit 2221257, United | States Taha Killingbeck, decided 4/2yfzoaa : en i a eS | . | : a | Te ble of Contents gta TE bicactly Related Case History _eble of Contents a Table sf Appendices Table ef Authocities _. Weble ef Statufes tt rable of Constitittional issues to ce rable of Federal Court Rules 32 pean is titian NS tatementof Cose \Tuciedictionand Enforcement 2 ——aastification for Granting Wit 30 er ee A ee a a a Se a i ee a | Table ef Appendices a, a