Dalton Alonzo Dixon v. North Carolina, et al.
LaborRelations
Whether the statutory presumption of consent when participating in a government program violates the Thirteenth Amendment's prohibition on slavery and involuntary servitude
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4) Sent CONSENT Aecessard , when articipatin in and Bim Orogram } o° ° J 5 2\ FP So, without CONSENT, isnt tho stalutory dresumphone), enohen 2 Rrew labor a Violation ¥ Pesan . irtoonth Amendment of the United States Conshtotiod (Slavery and Emvoluntary Servitude) 2 | BY Tent a United Splos CONSTITUTIONAL " citizen of the Unied Sales" per tho fFourlesath Amandmant motualle exeluswe and NOT equivalent to that of a Salto “Cdizen of the United Sates’ pr 8 USC.3 d4od ? sdon L hee ar ht of Lxpalriation ftom ang destructive unwanted dvernmunal Progcarn(s): outside of the penne? jurisdiction , and physically domiciled maida a “pte of the Union ?* aa so, Why has the Unded Stetos District and opellate Coutts under Article 4, andfor Article 4, Seckon 4% Clause 2 of dhe United Stes Constitution refsed — by acknowledge ny declaration to cease fom fother achons and reloaded. mo Looe BQY Commercial implied iD fact Contracts), agreements and Qolerrrmarial programs ? Yaoe A of 2 (See Attachment, Page 2 of 2N At ach 2(\ lan oko pa Continue) Quostion(s) —Hosented in Which 7 doclara a Nonon Q iolanon 0 gQ |b nalish Commoa Law ( Knowinale Alontarily ancl_intentiond!ly making a binding Hats) in tho “Distr *olymoia and ories. ~ oflocod ty” 0 rot). 0 anit moh), AgeClanng or yo Sovernment(s) once Vadis, 4, Sockon 8 , Clause 17 of the Undod Matos Constibution, rohibitod Hb