No. 22-6279

Alex Duncan v. Jennifer R. Bartone, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2022-12-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: accessibility ada civil-rights disability due-process equal-protection
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was instituted with the purpose of delivering an 'equal future' for all, when in reality some individuals have to 'fight' for how they are 'considered' in society, and how the ADA can address the 'future' needs of individuals with disabilities

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED The Amerjean wita MSobiliT<§ ACT CADA) Wwe Lnstiteted Wim Area Pur Pose To deliyev— awa Entute 9f How Tue Bx Pec tots cor he, /\, Jus { hecowe eT Everyone ) Vor Some of us [lave Vo Lehet goes lww7 mean IT 19 Couns] dered e De Soclety dem on Sa te5 dua (2vo vf bed eF ; |4ow Veath(Y CaAWn [Pow Tray “TA “Tae [Future , Mev tue less, Wi We doairy Ti7le d? Tac Same S\inoe LT tas heen deeply \E KP \enltdy

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 9, 2023)

Attorneys

Alex Duncan
Alex Duncan — Petitioner
Alex Duncan — Petitioner