No. 22-6280
Jose Adolpho Castillo v. Texas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process hearsay-testimony ineffective-assistance prejudice right-to-counsel standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas has made the standard articulated by this Court in Strickland v. Washington so malleable that Strickland has virtually no grip at all in protecting a criminal defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas has made the standard articulated by this Court in Strickland v. Washington; 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), so malleable that Strickland has virtually no grip at all in protecting a criminal defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel. ii ee i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Texas to respond filed.
2022-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 11, 2023)
Attorneys
Jose Castillo
Jose Adolpho Castillo — Petitioner
Texas
Lori Denise Brodbeck — Texas Office of the Attorney General, Respondent