Whether courts erred in declining to issue a certificate of appealability on a favorable claim of first impression concerning whether a district court's denial of equitable tolling of a habeas petitioner's statute of limitations who has demonstrated prima facie extraordinary circumstances is in tension with Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) and several district and circuit court decisions that have decided similar claims adversely

QUESTIONS PRESENTED } I. Whether i+ 1s indensistat with SlackuM@daniel, 539 us, 413 C2008) | Foca Couct of MePeals ts have declined tn (Suen Cetifecte of , BPaaldailit ara Colacolle claw of fy, ot imPression Cancernin3 . Whether a distict Corts denial ef eauictolde tatling ofa Holroos | Petitioners stelute £ liuitetions ithe has demonstrated Prima facie extraordinary Ciremmstances iS in tension With Holland ve Fada: 5d US. L31 C2010 aud Several district and Circcuk Court de| Cisions thet hate decided Siwilar Claims Afently? . | a. tyhether Coucts £ Nered lack tucsdictin aver an aeteal An ‘Rule . BAG) rhestion Whece a Prose Pnenor aereilaxt Saree net Fle a oO a SePacotte or Gurended notice sf c.PPend Fatlowind the denial of tos a . Motion : laut instead Proceeds under the PcesumOtion thet a Pre: . _ Couctionas Notice £ Alotect) Eu) oefae Oo decision on te Qule 52) Motion is Condesed Presents 000 Combined isoves for Gal?