Does testimony taken using two-way video violate the Confrontation Clause?

Question Presented Our constitution codifies the ancient right of confronting one’s accuser. Relying on Ohio v. Roberts, this Court has held a procedure which eliminates in person confrontation was permissible sos long as it furthered an important public policy, was necessary, and the testimony was reliable. The Court subsequently overturned Ohio v. Roberts in Crawford v. Washington. After Crawford, does testimony taken using two-way video violate the Confrontation Clause? 1