Keith Strom v. Douglas Mitchell, et al.
Securities
Should the State be allowed to impose child support payments that result in unavoidable poverty and severely damaged child-parent relationships?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1. Should the State via the district attorney, courts, or child support agencies be allowed to force child support payments so high that the resulting poverty on either parent is unavoidable and that child-parent relationships . are severely damaged? . 2. Should the State when involved in the welfare of children in divorces or separation situations value monetary terms more important than parentchild relationships, stability and security, extended family and identity histories, and multi-faceted education including the arts? 3. Should the State be more involved in saving parental relationships with children through denial of divorce and imposition of counseling, therapy, healing, and teaching parents to be less selfish and just grow up? 4. Should the State be held accountable financially and otherwise for damages | to children resulting from impositions and sanctions on one or both of the parents in ways that harm children? | 5. Should the State be allowed to suspend a driver’s license and the rights and privileges that go with it in an effort to collect money for reasons not related to driving and counter-productive to the interests of the children?