No. 22-6298
Antoinne Lee Washington v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cause-of-action equitable-tolling failure-to-state-a-claim habeas-corpus habeas-proceedings heck-doctrine legal-malpractice statute-of-limitations
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a legal malpractice cause of action be dismissed for a failure to state a claim, in pursuant to the 'Heck Doctrine' (Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,489 (1994), without applying equitable tolling to the statute of limitations, or in the alternative, staying the claims until habeas proceedings are resolved
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. May a legal malpractice cause of action be dismissed for a failure to state a claim, in pursuant to the "Heck Doctrine" (Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,489 (1994), without applying equitable tolling to the statute of limitations, or in the alternative, staying the claims until habeas proceedings are resolved.
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 13, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent