No. 22-6311
Massey L. Allen, Jr. v. Nebraska
IFP
Tags: criminal-evidence criminal-procedure due-process evidence fourteenth-amendment jackson-v-virginia miranda-rights post-miranda-silence reasonable-doubt standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict under Jackson-v-Virginia
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether there was sufficient evidence adduced at trial to convict Petitioner of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt under this Court's holding in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979)? 2. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits citizens from being prosecuted for a mutual consent fight or combat resulting in death? 3. Whether Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights were violated under this Court's holding in Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976), when the prosecution used Petitioner's post-Miranda silence for impeachment at trial? | . i |
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-12-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2023)