No. 22-6316
Kalvin Walker v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court guideline-range harmless-error judicial-discretion sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether errors in calculating the Sentencing Guidelines are automatically rendered harmless by a district court's statement that the correctness of the guideline range would make no difference to its choice of sentence
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether errors in calculating the Sentencing Guidelines are automatically rendered harmless by a district court’s statement that the correctness of the guideline range would make no difference to its choice of sentence.
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Kalvin Walker
Patrick L. Bryant — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Patrick L. Bryant — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent