Whether the lower courts erred in holding that the petitioner did not meet the burden of establishing the respondents' deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and in holding that the petitioner did not meet the burden of establishing the gross negligence standard, when the petitioner provided evidence and certified documents supporting the petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED D Died he lower Coorts error ya haldis hsb +e Pehtorer did oot meet He burclen o£ CS ta Sls G25 He ESponcle~}s Oelbgerate rndiPlerente 7 vroleheg of the Eighth Amendment Weg He Pet hover po ttered Fesh mong and Cerhhed ev tence +bat She Petihorer was erthtled to cherogic Care mecdient treatment Suk was refuted pre Pehhorens repeat request fac meéeiesl treatmep for 11 months ? 2) Diel Se lower Courts ertor i holding dtak +e Pehhoe| Acd rolmeek the burdleg of establistis Oe gross OEG"GIe | Stopdand when +he pebhorer pro Elered ees anc Ce-thbhed eviclerce. ot clocumertks Supporhas the pe oe S Claes ot the respondent Alsi fying oer cin and medical records fo rete pre pehhore-~medical freatmert ?