No. 22-6324
Matthew Ruben Hernandez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion Bureau-of-Prisons civil-procedure discretionary-review extraordinary-and-compelling-reason medical-conditions pandemic pandemic-impact sentence-modification statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Sentence-modification-under-3582(c)(1)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Did the District Court abuse its discretion and misconstrue the law in determining that the Bureau of Prisons’ failure to manage Mr. Hernandez’s severe medical conditions, in light of the pandemic, did not constitute an extraordinary and compelling reason justifying a sentence modification under § 3582(c)(1)(A)? i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Matthew Ruben Hernandez
Ashwini Mate — Ashwini Mate, Petitioner
Ashwini Mate — Ashwini Mate, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent