Whether the Justices of the 1986 Supreme Court violated the substantive due process rights, protection and guarantees of the petitioner and American citizens

Question presented for Review . 1. Whether the Justices of the 1986 Supreme Court “deviation” from clearly established law and the original meaning of the Constitution violated the substantive due Process rights, Protection and Guarantees of petitioner Mark A. White and countless American citizens rights of the Constitution with the Court’s intentional violation of the Fifth and Sixth amendment. When the court “coined” the term “sentencing factors” which in exchange, removed elements of the offense as this violation transpired into the unconstitutional and irreconcilable decision of McMillan v. Pennsylvania. In which Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, Justice Thomas, Justice . Breyer and The late Justice Ginsberg concurs. . : 2. Whether the 1986:Supreme Court committed an irreconcilable legal error in their decision of os McMillan v. Pennsylvania and violated the petitioner’s substantive Due Process and affected the , _ judicial proceedings and outcomes of the American people who were prejudice by this irreconcilable interpretation of federal law. 3, Whether the petitioner is being illegally detained in federal prison based on the premise of the : district courts poisoried mindset of the irreconcilable reasoning and interpretation of federal law, which has been deemed unconstitutional. , , , 4. Whether the rationale of the district court’s decision-making has been tainted with judicial a errors that has derived from the 1986 McMillan v. Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision which has been deemed irreconcilable and cannot be home to our Sixth Amendment Jurisprudence. . ; Prefix : | . | .