No. 22-634
Richard Estle Carson, III v. Kathryn Hyland, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: class-action class-actions common-fund incentive-award incentive-awards representative-plaintiff representative-plaintiffs rule-23 service-award supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Related Cases:
22-566
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does Rule 23 abrogate this Court's holdings that payments in common-fund class actions to compensate representative plaintiffs for their personal services are inequitable, "illegal," and "decidedly objectionable"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Rule 23 abrogate this Court's holdings that payments in common-fund class actions to compensate representative plaintiffs for their personal services are inequitable, 'illegal,' and 'decidedly objectionable'?
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-28
Reply of petitioner Richard Estle Carson III filed.(Distributed)
2023-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent William Yeatman to respond filed.
2023-01-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 10, 2023, for all respondents.
2023-01-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2023 to March 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)
Attorneys
Hyland, Garcia, Saint-Paul, Spitler-Lawson, Means, Kaplan, Guth, Nocerino, Taylor and Church
Caitlin Joan Halligan — Selendy Gay Elsberg Pllc, Respondent
Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, LLC
Beth Susan Brinkmann — Covington & Burling, Respondent
Richard Estle Carson III
Eric Alan Isaacson — Law Office of Eric Alan Isaacson, Petitioner
William Yeatman
Theodore Harold Frank — Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Respondent