No. 22-6342

Palani Karupaiyan v. L. Naganda, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-19
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: all-writs-act civil-rights due-process extraordinary-writ judicial-relief jurisdiction legal-standard mandamus parallel-proceedings prohibition standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2023-03-31 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's requested relief of a writ of mandamus or prohibition was properly denied

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner's reliefs were prayed as Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition or } alternative so the questions were part of three test condition of the Writs. II.

Docket Entries

2023-04-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2023-03-15
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
2023-03-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-02-21
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2023)

Attorneys

Palani Karupaiyan
Palani Karupaiyan — Petitioner
Palani Karupaiyan — Petitioner