No. 22-6350
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-rights court-objection criminal-defense criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-strategy
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Must a client object in open court to invoke their Sixth Amendment right to maintain actual innocence as the objective of their defense?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Must a client object in open court to invoke their Sixth Amendment right to maintain actual innocence as the objective of their defense?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2023-01-18
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2022-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)
2022-11-15
Application (22A306) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until December 19, 2022.
2022-11-09
Application (22A306) to extend further the time from November 18, 2022 to December 18, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2022-10-12
Application (22A306) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 18, 2022.
2022-10-07
Application (22A306) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 19, 2022 to November 18, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Cato Institute
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
New York
Steven Chiajon Wu — New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Raul Alvarez
Xiao Wang — Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, Petitioner