No. 22-6351
Shane Webster Upchurch v. Wastequip, LLC, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure discovery discovery-rights jurisdiction-issue pro-se pro-se-plaintiff retaliatory-discharge summary-judgment workers-compensation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it was error to grant summary judgment to the defendant where the pro se plaintiff was not given any opportunity to engage in discovery
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | , 1, Whether it was error to grant summary judgment to the defendant where the pro se plaintiff was not given any opportunity to engage in discovery. 2. Whether it was error to disregard the exhibits submitted to the Court without reviewing them. t 3. Whether it was error to effectively deny the motion to amend. 4, Whether it was error holding Sole jurisdiction to the Workers’ Compensation Commission to oversee Retaliatory Discharge claims.
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent Wastequip, LLC, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)
Attorneys
Wastequip, LLC, et al.
Michael Clifton Felty — Lytle, Soule & Felty, P.C., Respondent
Michael Clifton Felty — Lytle, Soule & Felty, P.C., Respondent