No. 22-6355
Jess Richard Smith v. Sgt. Ellis, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process federal-courts federal-procedure free-speech habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief standing
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Khe Uuth Circo tks (0-722, ORDER Granting CVeseevdeniis _ Metion TO Reveke TH Comme
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; | \V) Whether Khe Uuth Circo tks (0-722, ORDER Granting CVeseevdeniis _ Metion TO Reveke TH Comme | | CASPENS Uvder 2 O-S.C. \N5 @ Wheee Strikes proyis (ous, C8CXES B Conllle*+ csitkh establts ne. Cedera| Cousk ok PPRPCAS Case lacs cegasding ; “ Gask Killing" SArike.s » | A) Wether the Ninth Crate O82, grautting Respendew\s Melek To Raveke, wis eyxcerd Ww escec because. Ldtluct cicikKe tte Coork
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-05
Waiver of right of respondents Sgt. Ellis, et al. to respond filed.
2022-12-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)
Attorneys
Sgt. Ellis, et al.
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent