No. 22-6356
Tyler Nees v. Oregon
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause cross-examination due-process evidence federal-review habeas-corpus hearsay independent-state-ground procedural-default sixth-amendment state-court
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment prohibits the admission of testimonial hearsay evidence without an opportunity for cross-examination
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED woo” Teslimental 7 That 3s was ty @veston Aske gid 4 present police ae aa oc dy YOUR POP ‘ fue eucnd pod enka Veleaant dy blew fee theo , ~ Couct vulad we Slubewend Wave in dependant videnee of tis ward ~ Ess and ‘web Ave Confeortn lion Clause does <0% AYP] ° wok allowm ma dye vey Ovestonas lies. was At $ { vndowen belly Yea 3 .
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent Oregon to respond filed.
2022-10-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)
Attorneys
Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent