No. 22-6357

Clifton Raye v. Tim Hooper, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Petitioner's rights under 6th Amendment to the United States Constitution violated when trial counsel was ineffective?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED i. Was Petitioner's rights under 6" Amendment to the United States Constitution violated when trial counsel was ineffective? 2. Did the State and Federal courts error in denying Pditioner's writs when there was a clear ciovwing that trial counsel was ineffective? 3. Based on the cumulative effect of trial counsel's errors, did tral counsel meet the a aandard provided for the 6° Amendment of the United States Constitution effective assistance of counsel? : ] 4. Did the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal failed to address the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial when trial counsel failed to object to a fatally defective indictment? 2

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Hooper to respond filed.
2022-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)

Attorneys

Clifton Raye
Clifton Raye — Petitioner
Tim Hooper
Shae Gary McPhee Jr.Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent