Tyrell Hart v. Kevin Ransom, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Dallas, et al.
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Whether the lower federal and state courts unreasonably applied this Court's holdings finding that Yart was not denied effective assistance of counsel regarding an involuntary confessions claim committed by detectives with a documented history of unconstitutional practices in obtaining false confessions (and newly presented evidence demonstrating same)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Tie lowar federal aad stete co:rts :sreasonably epplied tris Cozrt's toldisgs findisg tiet Yart was. eot deried effactive . assistanca of cosnseal regerdiag ee involiastery confessions claia ; coanitted by detactives witi ¢ docyneated iistory of . 7 sacoastitstiosgal prectices is obtefsiag false confessions (and sewly presented avidegce denonastretiag sane) jastifyiag certlorari by tiis Cort. (pgs. 9-13) . ; 2, Did tie lowar coi:rts (faderel ead state) sereasosably ; epply tiis Coirt's ioldiags ia fieding tiat Hert wes rot deaied tis sshstagtive Sixt. (5t1) 42d Posrteest1 (T4ti) J.S.C.A. rigits : ' to vetaised cosesel of cioice pursiaat to tiis Coirt's 10ldisng implicatieg, later alia, Usited States vs Conzalaz-Lopaz, 125 S. Cth. 2557 (2905) aed ineffective éssistarce of cozrsal sader tie material fects of tie clain denonstratisg 6 strictsrel error dae tia state court trial proceedisgs jistifyieg certfioreri? ¢ (pgs. 13-21) 3. Wietier tiis Cosrt s1031d graat certiorari to ester @ clesr ioldieg in 2 iabees corpis cese to decide wietier 4 hore petitiorser ts legally eaatitled to ieve tie federal courts naedate tie stete to prodica ell tiet treaspired ia tia state coirt ‘ proceediags for psrposes of federel raview co#ssistest witi Rslas Goverelreg 2254 ceses, Rile 5(c), wiera @ rabaes patitlosar ies raised s:bsterative clains of iseffectiva essistaaca of cozrsel : La failieg to review relevart traescriptioss of trial proceadirgs (pgs. 22-34) 4, Wietier tie lower cosrt's 1sva so fer departed fron tie : accepted aad 3ssal course of jidicial proceediags es to call for ag.axercise of tiis Coirt's sspervisory power 2s4/or-1ave decided aa importarst federal qsestiona ta 2 way tiet conflicts : wit relevent dectsioas of tils Cosrt regerdinag Yart's dealal of tis Sixt Aneadmeet rigit to a Speedy Trial . : (pgs. 34-40) . [ | . | . | | | 7 ; “