No. 22-6376

Marcus Joseph v. South Carolina

Lower Court: South Carolina
Docketed: 2022-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: arbitrary-suspension civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process ex-post-facto habeas-corpus proportionality-review sentencing-guidelines state-court
Latest Conference: 2023-06-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Respondent's arbitrary suspension of the writ of habeas corpus is constitutional

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ( 4) LUHETHER. oR Atr The Kesporvcne(Ae rirarteny Susperdeo THe weet CL obtusa freed 78 JA Lor | (2) LSHETICR. To Cotien LAK® TieewD i Kio 7d ec yep Guilty Plea Bro THe STArure Lrarcn whl He wes Walesres OD CONV TED Zs COASTITUTI O nan? Devthh Jeopordy Cause Zo ARS res VIELADod OF “TRE Ex-Dode Facto CUAUSE.. (S) wes pee Corurcty, CBIR Ag Fhe UP of peered TEST MOY, "C eID (6) was FWwe Tisdgenor? / Zn WLOLATLOAS oy Macey, YQ STATE ASISCEEK _ Saris Fe €pCT ATTER Firs ds DCT OW ive § (*) Lihed her SrBTEer MAT cco ng Wed Cette itil THE Mtoe OF DEI : Cc

Docket Entries

2023-06-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-03-17
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent South Carolina to respond filed.
2022-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)

Attorneys

Marcus Joseph
Marcus Joseph — Petitioner
South Carolina
Mark Reynolds FarthingS.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent