Whether the court had jurisdiction to re-sentence the petitioner to 18 years after initially sentencing him to 10 years

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Md Court We Goris dtedon to Rime) anl recharge then rerSoMeance again \2ars Later +e an ep ored sentence 2 TAP Peeve (US) duy Te Serve peril 2%, 2013 ths Court Couldat Ve Senne te (Vo) years 85 do Count 2 Vragreveted/ Battery Vrny 26/2516 Wo Violating Ave erocess anil couble Teapardy Clause . QWs wet sentence to probation fpr] 24,2013 as to Count 2 Ragramied /Badgery 2 fwrin entered Mito a detali plen agree ment ond NS af Jodicacted Qpilty oS te Count 2 Ragrwated / Cactiery Lo probation, @ Martin Senience was corrected again September | ,2020 qwardbey all credtt me served fram 2ol2 2 Deptof Corrections Ree lied Gat prior Seal Credt ant 164 erter erison Credle bur pempued 14 days arrtady served and wore originally Sentenced With missing TIA Sunt Court authorized an mii Court ‘order Steted Mortn Snouldve bean awarded all error Dall Credit antl all prior prison Credit adgitenaliy to Ane TI days adresdy Sentenced) with, Semenced with Na vy 26, 2016 Credit ¢© (Io) yenrs sentence. WD Ts mrt serving an iikeyel semonce 2 Whit cor be Corrected atany Time. Yes Martin aa an tesa Sevkence doe to Coot dyk not we Torisdtaion to 02 —Gnarye an Pesaneyce to (\8) yeas ant Court orker to pewrnrd gil Oreditr Pwe served Ir Oxet. of Lo (rection remaved) {71%} diay s |