No. 22-6381

Teresa Young v. Mary Seymour, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-abuse civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection healthcare-access libel-slander military-retaliation retaliation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Were the Plaintiff's Constitutional rights violated by the Defendants?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Were the Plaintiff's Constitutional rights violated by the Defendants? 2. Did the Defendants’ abuse their authority to unduly punish and/or retaliate against the Plaintiff? 3. Cana military official use unfounded libel and slander to abrogate the rights of an honorably discharged veteran’s access to healthcare and liberty to base amenities? 4. Did the Defendant’s actions against the Plaintiff constitute unlawful imprisonment? 5. Can any military official prevent the investigation of a punishment that it created without trial and evidence? 6. Can equal access to healthcare be criminalized by a government/military official? / Can a military official criminalize equity in healthcare access as part of a punishment? 7. Cana federal district court judge not grant the Plaintiff a jury trial when a jury demand was part of her complaint? 8. Can a district court judge alter/change the defendants in a case upon the request of the defendant without giving the Plaintiff 7-14 days to respond to the initial request? i | ; | |

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 23, 2023)

Attorneys

Teresa Young
Teresa Young — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent