Whether the USCA-7's imposition of a $500 sanction and bar from filing future habeas petitions against Gakuba constitutes a First Amendment retaliation violation by Illinois federal courts with a history of irrational bias against Gakuba

ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW IL GAKUBA V. JEFFREYS, 22-3039 (USCA7) (MOT. FOR AUTHORIZATION — 2%°-IN-TIME HABEAS) ($500 SANCTIONS AND BAR FROM FILING FUTURE HABEAS PETITIONS) Gakuba’s one—and only—§2254 habeas petition was not “frivolous” rendering the USCA-7’s sanction against Gakuba of “$500” and bar from any future federal habeas petitions constitutes a First Amendment retaliation violation by Illinois federal courts with a history of irrational bias and Gakuba. See 2013-14 Gakuba appeals (sanctions threatened in unsupported conclusory orders against Gakuba for asserting his rights per 18 USC §2710(d)-(e)). First, Fifth, and 14°” Amendments violations. i/iv