No. 22-64

Samuel Arrington v. City of Los Angeles, California, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-07-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights due-process excessive-force false-arrest false-imprisonment habeas-corpus heck-doctrine plea-agreement
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Heck applies to a former prisoner who was ineligible to challenge his subsequent conviction through federal habeas

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Heck applies to a former prisoner who was ineligible to challenge his subsequent conviction through federal habeas while he was incarcerated pending trial or after he was released. 2. Whether Heck bars a plaintiff from recovering damages for false arrest, false imprisonment, and excessive force after entering a plea of “no contest” under a plea agreement that he would be sentenced to time served and released.

Docket Entries

2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-07-26
Waiver of right of respondent City of Los Angeles, et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 24, 2022)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2022-03-16
Application (21A506) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 16, 2022.
2022-03-04
Application (21A506) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 17, 2022 to May 16, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main DocumentMain Document

Attorneys

City of Los Angeles, et al.
Shaun Dabby Jacobs — Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Shaun Dabby Jacobs — Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, Respondent
Samuel Calhoun Arrington
Nazareth M. Haysbert — Haysbert Moultrie, LLP, Petitioner
Nazareth M. Haysbert — Haysbert Moultrie, LLP, Petitioner