No. 22-6407

Steven L. Haden v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2022-12-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: categorical-approach criminal-sentencing descamps-v-united-states elements-test mathis-v-united-states prior-conviction prior-conviction-enhancement retroactivity sixth-amendment teague-doctrine
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the Sixth Amendment holdings of Descamps v. United States and Mathis v. United States fully retroactive?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented Are the Sixth Amendment holdings of Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254 (2013) and Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016) fully retroactive, because those opinions categorically prohibit imposition of a prior conviction enhancement when the enhancement requires additional facts beyond the adjudicated elements of the prior conviction offense? This is the same question presented in this Court case number 226094, distributed for January 6, 2023, conference. 1

Docket Entries

2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2022-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 27, 2023)

Attorneys

Steven Haden
Gene David VorobyovLAW OFFICE OF GENE VOROBYOV, Petitioner
Gene David VorobyovLAW OFFICE OF GENE VOROBYOV, Petitioner