Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and four Defendant judges' ongoing 17 years' cover up or violations of Petitioner's prospective denial of access claims' two constitutional underlying claims should be remedied

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Whether this Supreme Court or Solicitor General should | invoke its supervisory powers to deter the illegal acts of and implement a remedy for the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals and four Defendant judges', ongoing 17 years, cover up or violations of Petitioner's prospective denial of access claims’ two constitutional underlying claims of both :a Sixth Amendment right : to trial by jury and a Fifth Amendment right to a Legitimate Expectation of Finality as to the severity of his instant sentence and detention's legality not to exceed beyond 21 months or a date of October 2003? 2. Whether the Circuit Court's, ongoing 17 years, cover up, overlooking or not deciding of the cause's only presented two grounds of prospective claims, and yet its deciding of the same cause soley based upon the Circuit Court's unpresented and fabricated single ground of a retrospective claim, so far departed from the proper standards in the administration of justice, to call for this Court's supervisory powers in light of Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403, 413-15 (2002); United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 11 (1970); Mcnabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332, 340-41 (1943); and United States v. Hastings, 461 U.S. 499, 505 (1983)? I « oe |