No. 22-6428
Jermaine Scott v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 appellate-review certificate-of-appealability certiorari-standard circuit-court-review civil-rights district-court due-process federal-habeas judicial-discretion procedural-standard standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals abused its discretion in denying petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . cl.) Whether tire United States court of Appeals for the RCH cireultt abused its discretion when +dewied peHitloner’s request for issuance of a cerbiticate oF anpeal abi | ty, Based on its concluston thet petitioner Aid not make the requisite sheusing under 2FUS-C, 2AS3BCNQ, and on tts conclusion that te district reyected petitioners 225° motion claims onthe merits? oo .
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 30, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent