No. 22-6440

Damian Thomas v. Delaware

Lower Court: Delaware
Docketed: 2023-01-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment perjured-testimony post-conviction post-conviction-relief procedural-bar prosecutorial-misconduct
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law violated when his conviction was obtained through the use of perjured testimony and as a result of prosecutorial misconduct?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Was petitioner’s Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law violated when his conviction was obtained through the use of perjured testimony and as a result of prosecutorial misconduct? i

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent Delaware to respond filed.
2022-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 2, 2023)

Attorneys

Damian Thomas
Megan Venerick-GiffinLaw Office of Christopher S. Koyste. LLC, Petitioner
Megan Venerick-GiffinLaw Office of Christopher S. Koyste. LLC, Petitioner
State of Delaware
Sean P. Lugg — Respondent
Sean P. Lugg — Respondent