No. 22-6442
Brennan Thomas Baker v. Wyoming
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion cell-phone-recording criminal-evidence criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-abuse-of-discretion fourth-amendment legal-admissibility surveillance surveillance-footage witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court abuse its discretion in admitting the state's cell phone recording of surveillance footage?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT ADMITTED THE STATE’S CELL PHONE RECORDING OF SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE THAT CAPTURED THE ALTERCATION BETWEEN MR. BAKER AND HIS VICTIM? Baker v. State of Wyoming Petition for Writ of Certiorari Page 2 of 23
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Wyoming to respond filed.
2022-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Brennan T. Baker
Brennan T. Baker — Petitioner
State of Wyoming
Jenny Lynn Craig — Office of the Wyoming Attorney General, Respondent